--- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 25, 2006, at 5:21 PM, authfriend wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Nov 25, 2006, at 3:49 PM, bob_brigante wrote: > > <snip> > >> Taking responsibility only means something if the person > >> taking it changes their behavior for the better. My guess > >> is, they'll simply be more careful next time, nothing much > >> else will change. They don't give an apology or pledge not > >> to do it again. > >> > >>> and apologizing for the error that led to its release. > >> > >> Bingo. The error was in the release, not in the editing. > > > > To my mind, the big error wasn't the editing per > > se, but the fact that they didn't say anything > > about the fact that changes had been made, or > > indicate the changes by enclosing them in square > > brackets, which really is de rigeur. > > Any way you look at it, it's seriously dishonest. I'm really even > amazed that anybody from the TMO even bothered to address it. > > Sal >
Did someone put gigantic meta-quotes around the entire thing? It's editing a news article for Believer's consumption, but hardly the worst thing that could have been done. I mean, which substantive facts were changed?
