--- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any way you look at it, it's seriously dishonest. > I'm really even amazed that anybody from the TMO > even bothered to address it.
Bingo. That's the interesting part about this, isn't it? In all the years I was a part of the TM movement (which admittedly is a long time ago), I never saw any of the movement higher-ups the *least* bit concerned about what the peons (those who were not at the Center, in Seelisberg) thought about their decisions and their policies. It just wouldn't have come up. What I'm wondering -- out of curiosity, not rancor -- is whether the recent inability of the movement to inspire enough people to drop every- thing and go to the IA course might have shaken things up a bit? I mean, at least when I was a part of it, being at the top meant that everyone below you in the hierarchy pretty much did as they were told to do. Call for a "drop everything" course and they did, no questions asked. Now the peons are asking questions. It must be putting a few people at the top of the attention chain through a few changes.
