--- In [email protected], "lurkernomore20002000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], Peter <drpetersutphen@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- sparaig <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Peter > > > > <drpetersutphen@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Amen to that, brother. I actually transecend while > > > > > doing the middle rhythm of SK. Its very funny > > > > because > > > > > the mind loses all content other than the > > > > foundational > > > > > intent it had right before it transcended/stopped > > > > and > > > > > when it becomes active again it has no idea why > > > > the > > > > > body is huffing and puffing for a few moments > > > > before > > > > > memory kicks in. SK is really quite amazing. A > > > > yogic > > > > > cognition by SSRS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Completely different than TM's transcendental > > > > consciousness. > > > > > > Sparaig, you have truly got to be kidding me. First of > > > all this is my experience, not yours and second of all > > > you don't even do SK. You are only speaking out of TB > > > dogma, now aren't you? Transcendental consciousness > > > can be reached by a near infinite number of procedures > > > and techniques. It boggles the mind to think that you > > > truly believe that MMY and the techniques of the TMO > > > are the only valid and legitimate means of > > > experiencing what one already "is."? > > > > *You* have to be kidding, Peter, to suggest > > Lawson said anything even remotely like that. > > Lawson English. Master of the Ready, Shoot, Aim.
This applies more to Peter in this case than it does to Lawson. Actually, I more or less agree with Lawson on this, in that what Peter described sure doesn't *sound* like TM's transcendental consciousness. And that's based on my experience of TM, not on TM "dogma." But for Peter to claim Lawson was saying TM is the only way to achieve transcendental consciousness is just so far off target it's mind-boggling. It's ready, shoot, don't even bother about the aiming part. Same with Barry claiming Lawson was trying to excuse the TMO's making changes in the WaPo article by resorting to the "Yeah, but they do it too" argument. Barry is well aware that Lawson has been beating up on Chopra for years for rewriting his books. He doesn't excuse Chopra, so how could he possibly be using Chopra to excuse the TMO? We all know Barry gets stupid when he's overcome by his compulsion to put down TMers. It's just very odd to see Peter doing the same thing.
