In a message dated 11/28/06 8:54:28 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes we don't need to reexamine freedom of speech and we need to take back what curbs have put on freedom speech. Anyone knows that freedom of speech and terrorist attacks have nothing in common. It is a straw man argument. Freedom of speech is not an absolute freedom. You can't yell "fire" in a crowded theater and you can't slander people. What specifically has Newt proposed as far as curbing freedom of speech? Is he referring to terrorist web-sites on the Internet? What curbs have already been made that you want to take back?
