sparaig wrote: > --- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >> In a message dated 11/29/06 1:29:53 P.M. Central Standard Time, >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> >> Curtailing terrorist websites completely is probably impossible and >> probably >> counter- >> indicated anyway. As long as they get to publish stuff freely, you at least >> know what they >> are thinking (or at least want you to think they are thinking). The further >> underground >> such groups go, the harder it will be to stop them. >> >> >> >> Is that what he proposed? >> >> > > Dunno. Haven't read about the issue. Was just pointing out that censorship of > free speech > might be counterproductive, even if it is "terrorist free speech." > > > The article was short so it won't tax anyone's attention span.
Here's a slightly longer one with reactions: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15950137/ Also the RIAA wants to just shut down the net: http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36027 BTW the record industry was pretty much founded by the mafia who needed records to put in their jukeboxes. That's why we get stuck astounding thinking from the RIAA.
