--- In [email protected], Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > sparaig wrote: > > --- In [email protected], MDixon6569@ wrote: > > > >> > >> In a message dated 11/29/06 1:29:53 P.M. Central Standard Time, > >> sparaig@ writes: > >> > >> Curtailing terrorist websites completely is probably impossible and > >> probably > >> counter- > >> indicated anyway. As long as they get to publish stuff freely, you at > >> least > >> know what they > >> are thinking (or at least want you to think they are thinking). The > >> further > >> underground > >> such groups go, the harder it will be to stop them. > >> > >> > >> > >> Is that what he proposed? > >> > >> > > > > Dunno. Haven't read about the issue. Was just pointing out that censorship > > of free speech > > might be counterproductive, even if it is "terrorist free speech." > > > > > > > The article was short so it won't tax anyone's attention span. > > Here's a slightly longer one with reactions: > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15950137/
I prefer the original: http://www.newt.org/backpage.asp?art=3819 I tend to disagree on general principles but since his proposal is so vague, it's hard to argue his point save that I am uneasy with it. > > Also the RIAA wants to just shut down the net: > http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=36027 > > BTW the record industry was pretty much founded by the mafia who needed > records to put in their jukeboxes. That's why we get stuck astounding > thinking from the RIAA. >
