--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shukra69" <stephen4359@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Does anyone know what Maharishi states is the correct sequence > > > > for reading the Vedic literature? > > > > > > 1. Close mind. > > > 2. Open book. > > > > Heh. So reading Sanskrit out loud without trying to > > comprehend it requires a closed mind? > > B-b-b-but Lawson, that's what Barry *means*. > Since you aren't going to be *using* your mind, > you might as well close it; then you won't be > tempted to try to make sense of the Sanskrit. > > <guffaw> > > > Seems to me that you have to have some semblance of an > > open mind to bother with such a task, unless you're so > > fanatical about MMY's teachings that you just assume > > he's correct in the first place. > > However, there's no need for an open mind once > you've already decided MMY isn't correct about > *anything*. > > Pathological. >
Especially since BARRY is the one who has implied that using the TM-Sidhis course, since it is not sanskrit based, can't possibly work. I mean, BARRY apparently believes that reading/thinking sanskrit has some special effect... ...unless, of course, it is something that MMY has advocated. Pathological indeed...
