--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> 
wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > And, one might add, "posting away" while being hideously
> > > overweight, not having had sex in over ten years, being
> > > out of a job for long periods of time and spending hours 
> > > per day posting to the Internet to "defend TM" and "defend
> > > Maharishi" from their detractors -- and all of this while 
> > > not believing in TM enough himself to meditate regularly.
> > 
> > Oh, and intentionally, viciously cruel.  Did I
> > mention cruel?
> 
> Perhaps it's better to be "kind," TM-fashion, and
> allow Lawson to *pretend* that he's a healthy, on-
> the-program TMer with a life of his own.

In fact, Lawson doesn't "pretend" any such thing.
Remember, he's the one who told us all this in the
first place.  He has more self-knowledge than you'll
ever dream of having.

> I'm trying to get him to put his actions where his
> mouth is and actually *practice* TM instead of 
> spending all his time hypocritically "defending" it
> while not practicing it.

Sorry, but you have less-than-zero credibility in
the "compassion" department where TMers are concerned,
speaking of pretending.  Your intention is to hurt,
not to help.  That's what you *do* here.  It's
what you did on alt.m.t.  If you can't score on-topic
points, you'll resort to basing your attacks on
folks' personal lives (even if you have to make up
what you're attacking, as you've so often done with
me).

And speaking of hypocrisy, you have more of it in your
little finger than Lawson does in his whole body.  You
make one vow after another to "reform" your various
bad behaviors and haven't ever managed to keep a single
vow--just as one for-instance.

<snip>
> *You* Encouraging him to continue being an Internet
> junkie "defending TM" while trying to draw attention 
> away from the fact that he doesn't even meditate is 
> YOUR way of *perpetuating* his problems. You're an
> enabler.

I don't do either, of course.  You're just pissed
that I refuse to enable your perpetuation of *your*
problems.  You can dish it out, but you can't take it.


Reply via email to