--- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > jstein wrote: > > > So, you can't post any quotations from Skolnick's > > > "Hoodwinked" article - I thought so. > > > > The title isn't "Hoodwinked." > > > Well, I'm glad we got the title of Skolnick's article cleared up.
The title, as you know, is "Maharishi Ayur-Veda: Guru's Marketing Scheme Promises World Eternal 'Perfect Health.'" > > And yes, I could, but since you can do that perfectly well for > > yourself, of course I'm not going to bother. > > > Why not, you seem to have plenty of time debating this fellow about > the title of the article. There isn't any "debate" about the title of the article. All I'm doing here is correcting your knowingly false statements. > Maybe you don't have a copy to quote from. As I've already explained, it's in storage. But there are plenty of quotes from it, as I've also already pointed out (and as you know anyway), in my and others' posts in the discussions on alt.m.t. > From: Judy Stein > Date: Sun, May 30 1999 12:00 am > Groups: alt.meditation.transcendental, sci.skeptic > Subject: Move Over Maharishi > http://tinyurl.com/worhk > > At some point after the preliminary injunction ruling, plaintiffs > moved to have Deepak Chopra, who had been extensively and viciously > disparaged by name in Andrew's article, added as a plaintiff. And as you know, the case was dismissed before the motion could be ruled on, as I went on to speculate in the very post you quote, and as Skolnick himself confirmed in his response, in the very same thread.
