--- In [email protected], "claudiouk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "one leader - one party - one ideology" - the constitution of the > universe? > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6212430.stm > What comes next for Venezuela? > By Greg Morsbach > BBC News, Caracas >
"The whole country will be geared towards the motto: one leader - one party - one ideology," he added. Sort of alike but shades of difference. Venezuela in the realm of politics and government they got democracy a.k.a. `power of the people' giving their power over to an autocrat then heading towards a totalitarian state with the strongmen. With Maharishi and the TMorg he has been the autocrat & the ego of the institution under it from early on all along. At times with faces of theocracy, autocracy and then totalitarian. Its name to MUM and M everything, you have a cult theocracy with megalomaniacal messianic narcissists at the helm here. Maharishi now more commonly closes off critical discussion of how things are going by saying, "Mind your own business". It evidently is big business, which makes it different from State political structures. But similarly, power corrupts, as they say. & Infinite power corrupts infinitely? Probably there also is similarity to the TMorg with things about the slide through the Iranian revolution, from the Shaw as autocrat displaced to theologic state to autocrat in Kohmeni, then the totalitarianism of the Ayatollahs. Revolutionary theology was utopian as it started out and then supplanted by the strongmen under the revolution all along, ending up totalitarian. Mighty big power struggle and play under it all. Not unlike the TMO. -Doug in FF
