--- In [email protected], Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> jim_flanegin wrote:
> > --- In [email protected], Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote:
> >
> >> So considerate of the rag-tag terrorist bunch to make sure the
> >>
> > building
> >
> >> fell into their footprint.
> >>
> >>
> > <snip>
> > I had my doubts over time about 9-11 happening the way it was
> > reported to. However after seeing the present crew of imbicilic
> > idealogues at work in the White House, I now think that they
were
> > just as in so many other areas both blind to the possibility of
this
> > happening-- Condaleeza Rice was a Soviet 'specialist' after all-
-
> > and in addition, though this group is very big on ideas and
fantasy,
> > utterly incapable of forwarding their agenda no matter what. A
true
> > case of the gang who couldn't shoot straight.
> >
> > Have they tried to take advantage of all the power they found
> > themselves with? Absolutely! Have they completely abused that
power?
> > Absolutely! Are they a corrupt bunch of incompetents?
Absolutely.
> > Will the country be better off without them? Yes. Do they have a
> > clue about how to proceed now that they don't have absolute
power
> > within the government? Nope. Do I wish impeachment were at the
top
> > of the Democrats' agenda? Absolutely.
> >
> >
> >
>
> The best account of 9-11 I have read is Webster G. Tarpley's "9-11
> Synthetic Terror." It is very well documented. He approaches it
as a
> "who done it" and believes that Bush was actually blackmailed by
an
> internal rogue group who were responsible for 9-11 and capitulated
to
> their demands. He puts forth some very compelling arguments for
that
> scenario.
> http://tarpley.net/
>
Sounds interesting- I'll check it out.
