--- In [email protected], kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], kaladevi93 <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], kaladevi93 <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > If you think Vaj is a "TB", I guess you never really talked to > > him > > > > or heard his talk on > > > > > Spiritual Anarchy and how genuine spirituality is anarchistic > > by > > > > nature... > > > > > > > > > Kind of funny to say someone that calls himself Vajranatha is a > > > > spiritual anarchist, don't you think? That name sounds very much > > > > aligned with organized religion, probably Tibetan Buddhism. Oh > > well, > > > > one person's spiritual anarchist is another's religous shill, eh? > > > > > > > > > > Don't know much about the Naths do ya Jim? > > > > > Please explain. > > > > Thanks, that did answer my question. BTW, do you have some strange foot fetish or do > you just enjoy sticking your foot in your mouth? > > To answer your question there is probably no other group of yogins that would be > considered less of an "organized religion" than the Nathas. They do epitomize freedom > and sahaja. > I just read a little while ago that Vajranatha is a Tibetan Buddhist expression. Or perhaps I am wrong?
You too appear to have taken a name other than your birth name, to uphold your spiritual anarchy, I suppose. Your fake name sounds Hindu- not very anarchistic. Oh well, call me Confused, and good luck with that.
