On Dec 18, 2006, at 9:43 AM, Marek Reavis wrote: > > Not too conversant in contract law but, though you can include > anything in a contract, if a term or condition is practically speaking > unenforceable then it's just words on paper. Since it's an apartment > rather than a stand-alone, the presumption is that there is a > homeowners association or somesuch that governs shared bylaws and > conditions of the whole property of which the apartment or condo is a > sub-unit, and therefore they have some controlling power over changes > within. But that strikes me as unenforceable. Property is the big > cheese in American law. It's sacrosanct and unassailable in so many > ways and to have one's property rights so restricted (and by such an > arbitrary entity as any arm of the TMO) seems bogus. > > But I'm way out here in California trying to keep criminals out on the > street, so you'll want to take what I say on the subject with a > certain amount of caution.
Thanks! Sal
