--- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 21, 2006, at 8:52 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
> 
> > --- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Well I always wondered why they took such a great movement,
> >> with so many devoted followers, and pretty much totally
> >> wrecked it.  As Marek pointed out, now, even when they
> >> introduce something that might be of value, the motivations
> >> are so suspect that most of us don't even bother.
> >
> > That's the thing that's striking me lately. The TMO
> > keeps enforcing these policies that would *deny*
> > TMers and teachers the supposed benefits of being
> > a "member in good standing" of the TM movement.
> >
> > But as far as I can tell, there aren't any.
> 
> Bingo.
> 
> > When was the last time anything was offered that was
> > of interest?
> 
> There really hasn't been anything in quite a while.  It's mostly 
> recycled ideas for the few TBs left.
> 
> > Therefore, threatening to declare someone
> > anathema and keep them out of the domes or keep them
> > from teaching TM (which they can't do anyway without
> > paying another $4000 for a course they already took)
> > is sorta like being growled at by a toothless lion.
> 
> I know there are a few out there still willing to try and teach without 
> the recert course and are willing to buck the TMO to do it, but I can't 
> begin to imagine why.  It isn't easy to relate to that kind of devotion 
> in the face of such massive incompetence.

And yet, a good percentage of the country still likes GW BUsh... It's only his 
War in IRaq 
figures that are all that low.

Reply via email to