--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For me, a "success" would be if Maharishi put out a "call > to action" to his many students over the years and those > students did what was asked of them. Do the math -- let's > say that the TMO has (conservatively) taught 1,200,000 > people to meditate over the years. But only 1200 or so > people -- at the *peak* of the pre-pundit "numbers" -- > answered the call and bothered to show up for this course. > If you can't do the math, that's -- synchronistically -- > one-tenth of one percent.
Nah, you're just being glib, Barry - Knowing you, if that happened, you'd be all upset that the course participants were clones or TBs or something. God knows there'd be *something* wrong with it... The way you and Steve twist whatever comes out of Maharishi's mouth to suit your purposes, there is absolutely NO WAY you would ever declare a course of Maharishi's a success. Your and Steve's constant naysaying of Maharishi's speech and actions speak far louder about the lack of success of your own respective practices, than anything you may be saying about Maharishi. I mean look at this- Do any others here that practice TM spend years on some website that discusses and promotes another practice, Christianity for example, just so they can throw mud at it? It wouldn't seem so weird to me if you guys did TM or had any connection to it. But you don't. You just camp out here, slinging mud at TM, TMO and Maharishi. What's up with that??
