--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Yep. Of course, how many people drop what they are doing > > > > > > to head to ANYTHING on a moment's notice? > > > > > > > > > > Many, if not most, of the people on this list. > > > > > They did it for decades. Some still do. > > > > > > > > You've taken a poll, right? > > > > > > No, I was a TM teacher, during the era where > > > pretty much the definition for being one was > > > being able to drop what you are doing and go > > > where you were asked to go. Many, if not most, > > > of the people on this list were, too. > > > > You've taken a poll, right? > > > > > > Jeez, Barry, *try* to start curbing your > > > > fantasies for the new year, OK? > > > > > > If you'd ever had the experience of living > > > like this, perhaps you wouldn't consider it > > > a fantasy. But you haven't, have you? Sad. > > > > Not my point, of course. But you knew that; > > you thought you'd just try to sneak in yet > > another non sequitur slam. > > > > The vast majority of people on this list *never > > post*. You don't have a clue whether they were > > teachers or not. > > > > And if you're referring just to those who do post > > and have said they were teachers, that's, what, > > maybe 20 people. > > > > If what you were trying to say was that in the > > past many TM teachers would drop everything to > > attend a hastily called course, nobody's > > disputing that. But I do wonder how many such > > courses there were in your day. > > > > Your posts today have been really garbled and > > off-target. You sound as though you're so mad > > at the world you can't think straight. > > > > Not a great way to start the new year. > > Sounds to me like someone is not happy > about being reminded that as far as the > TM movement goes, she was never a player.
(Says Barry, trying, as usual, to change the subject so he won't have to address his own goof, but inadvertently demonstrating the accuracy of both my observations about his posts today, as well as my previous observation about his tendency to shoehorn non sequitur slams into his posts.) No, Barry, *you're* the one who gets all riled up about my not having been a TM teacher. I made the right choice and have never regretted it. > And that she's on a forum full of people > who were. As I said, you'd be well advised to take the new year as an opportunity to work on living in reality rather than in your fantasy world.
