--- In [email protected], Jonathan Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > John Hagelin now routinely introduces Maharshi as "the greatest Vedic scholar > in the world." Are there any faculty from leading academic institutions who e.g. teach Sanskrit who agree with this?
Does it matter? If he's correct about things, than he transcends scholarship. If he's not, then he's just a crazy old coot. Either way, what do the opinions of a bunch of scholars mean in this context?
