--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "peterklutz" <peterklutz@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "peterklutz" <peterklutz@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "larry.potter" > > > > <larry.potter@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > From: <MDixon6569@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 1/10/07 12:02:41 P.M. Central Standard > > > Time, > > > > > > jflanegi@ writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a chill pill. I sincerely doubt Iran would ever > invade > > > or > > > > > > attack Israel. The rhetoric from their prez is spun to > make > > > it > > > > > seem > > > > > > that way, but it ain't gonna happen. As usual, the US is > > > scaring > > > > > the > > > > > > crap out of some country, and when the country reacts, we > > > say "Oh > > > > > > they are getting ready for an attack!". The only two > > > countries in > > > > > > the last ten years to invade other countries are the US > and > > > > > Israel. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Yeah, I'll take a chill pill but you need a reality check. > > > > > Hezzbola and > > > > > > Hamas picked a fight with Israel this past summer who were > > > > > supported directly by > > > > > > Iran probably for the purpose of getting Iran and their > > > nuclear > > > > > program off > > > > > > the front pages while the E 8 met in Moscow. No, Iran > isn't > > > going > > > > > to invade > > > > > > Israel, not with an American army in between them and not > when > > > > > they have their > > > > > > proxy Hezzbola to do it for them. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jim also "forgets" that the recent Israel-Lebanon war > occurred > > > after > > > > > Lebanon via Hezbollah invaded Israel and started a war cycle. > > > > > > > > > > "The conflict began when Hezbollah fired Katyusha rockets > and > > > > > mortars at Israeli military positions and border villages, > > > diverting > > > > > attention from another Hezbollah unit that crossed the > border > > > and > > > > > abducted two Israeli soldiers and killed three others.[1] > > > Israeli > > > > > troops attempted to rescue the abducted soldiers but were > > > > > unsuccessful. > > > > > .. > > > > > > > > > > On 11 August 2006, the United Nations Security Council > > > unanimously > > > > > approved UN Resolution 1701 in an effort to end the > hostilities. > > > The > > > > > resolution, which was approved by both Lebanese and Israeli > > > > > governments the following days, called for disarmament of > > > Hezbollah, > > > > > for withdrawal of Israel from Lebanon... " (wikipedia.org) > > > > > > > > > > Israel kept it's part of the 1701 resolution, while > Hezbollah > > > > > didn't, in fact every day under the eye of the UN, Hezbollah > is > > > > > getting weapons mainly from Iran and Syria. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Absolutely, though I think more approriate would be to say > that the > > > > Israeli defense kicked into action AFTER Iran via Hezbollah - > with > > > the > > > > government and people of Lebanon as hostages - embarked on > > > > indiscriminate killing by shooting rockets into Israel. > > > > > > > I draw my conclusions partly from the numbers of dead. Israel > though > > > they have a much better PR engine kills ten to one hundred times > > > more enemies than their enemies do of them, yet they always > position > > > themselves as the victims. > > > > Are you seriously expecting people now to be shamed into silence > for > > the Israelis for being better soldiers? > > No, of course not. > > > > That's probably one of the most antisemitic and un-American > attitudes > > statements I've come across in this collection of dysfunctional > humans. > > > > Ever heard of the Stockholm syndrome? > > > You are implying that I am anti-Israeli, and I am not. I am saying > that both sides must recognize what they are doing, and not continue > to all hold the position that they are somehow 100% right and the > other side is 100% wrong. I am not suggesting it is an easy thing to > do, just that it is the only way the bloodshed will stop. >
Implying? I'm throwing it your face! You really missed that? And how can you deny it? You errors this time: Is any of the parties really claiming to be 100% right and the other 100% wrong..? Certainly not the Israelis or their government. Are you sure accepting your oversimplified and naive statement statement as a fact is the ONLY way "bloodshed will stop?"
