--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > On Jan 12, 2007, at 3:35 PM, llundrub wrote:
> > 
> > > They have no Buddhist samayas as these include not despairaging 
> past
> > > masters.
> > 
> > 
> > Actually Buddha insisted no one accept anything at face value and 
> to  
> > question authority: esp. those claiming to be great gurus (I'm  
> > doubting this would exclude todays McMasters and avatards). The 
> Dalai  
> > Lama has also explicitly stated that when things go wrong with a 
> guru  
> > (sexcapades, etc.) you need to let everyone know what went down, 
> even  
> > putting it in newspapers. Their samayas to their own consciences 
> are  
> > intact.
> > 
> > And if the website is correct: they've helped thousands. That's a  
> > good thing. And they were also the front troops of people really  
> > standing up and questioning the authority of the TMO. And they 
> took  
> > the brunt of TB abuse along with the collective egregore of the 
> rank- 
> > and-file believers. It's always been extremely important for 
> bleeding  
> > heart TB's to spread misinformation on these first dissenters.  
> > Hardline TMers hurl themselves on these people like they were  
> > Palestinians with bombs strapped to their bodies.
> 
> You know, I was on alt.m.t throughout Knapp's tenure
> at Trancenet, and Joe Kellet's and Sudarsha's later
> campaigns against TM--not to mention Andrew Skolnick's--
> and I don't recall anyone spreading misinformation "on"
> them.
> 
> TMers--and not just "hardliners"--did, however, have
> to repeatedly correct the misinformation these people
> spread about TM.
>

Perhaps Vaj would like to watch intaerations during a Wiki article creation? 
Joe Kellet is 
helping write thearticle. He knows better than to make the wild assertions that 
he does on 
his website.



Reply via email to