--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], off_world_beings <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Ok, if you are in France Turquoise B, then you just posted > > > a post at 3 o'clock in the morning. If you are not a drunk > > > staying up to 3am and posting, are you an insomniac? > > > > Off, first you can't spell, and now it seems you > > can't tell time, either. I was up late last night, > > working on a project that's due this morning, but > > you're considerably...uh...Off in your estimates. > > Yahoo says that my last post was at 12:39. > > That's what Yahoo says *now*. But was it what Yahoo > said when Off made his post? > > I mean, you're known to cancel posts that you find > to be "inconvenient" in one way or another.
I see. So you're saying that I, afraid that someone would discover that I'd been posting late at night, canceled those posts and then went back in time and sent the one that Off quoted in *his* post *in the past*, so it would bear the Yahoo timestamp of 11:32 that it has now. Did I get that right? :-) :-) :-) Or maybe, just so I can assign you a makework project again :-), I went back and deleted all the posts I really *did* make at 3:00 a.m. last night? If I were you I'd go through all of the posts made last night and check to make sure that the numbers are contiguous. Then again, if you did something like that, you wouldn't be able to throw insinuations around...uh...like you just did. :-) When that fails, however, you can always come back to the time travel theory. It's one of the most amusing you've ever come up with. Your Saturn must be transiting the sign of Insanity lately.:-)
