--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> wrote (about Vaj): > > > > What is this incoherent mess trying to say? More crap > > from the faux-Buddhist little Vajee? Buddha spits in > > his face. > > What a flaming asshole you are! > > If you do half the heart felt humanitarian work this man > has done, then you can complain. Holy hell, last I talked > to him he'd spent his last three vacations (including all > of last Christmas) at children's orphanages. And I bet > you and wife no. 2 only have visitation rights for your > kids. If only you were half the man, then you might be a > real man.
You misunderstand. Jim's outburst above, coming as it does from Jim the noted Buddhist authority who is convinced that Buddha once said, "God is love," is not really coming from Jim. It's a *cosmic* statement, coming not from ego or self but from the Whole Tamale, God HimSelf, the veritable Big Brahman. As the BB explained recently: It only looks like there is a self certain of its beliefs from the outside, but the actual process, the subjective experience, is more like an instant- aneous self-referral, then instantaneous release, with the self-referral result being reported. There is in reality no self experienced, and so no beliefs or convincing. :-) Just pokin' a little fun, Jim. If you think about it, and reread your first quote above, you might begin to understand why not all of us are convinced that the proclamations you consider Absolute Truth are 1) really coming from the place you think they are or 2) are really true, much less Truth. I guess they *could* be, but in that case I'd have to believe that Big Brahman really has it in for Vaj, and is working up a big loogie to expectorate at him even now, and that's just not my idea of how Brahman (or Buddha) spends the day. :-) In other words, when you're not acting like an obsessed fuck you talk the talk well. It's just that when you *are* acting like an obsessed fuck, you don't exactly walk the walk of that talk very well. If you're in the former state of attention today, can you explain this seeming contradiction to us? Is it just the paradox of Brahman, or could you possibly be just another limited self working its hangups out in public, just like the rest of us?
