Well said, Mark. I wouldn't touch the last lines with a ten-foot pole :-), but I sure am interested to hear the response.
The problem with believing that you know the Absolute Truth is that it all too often goes hand in hand with believing that you have the right (or worse, the God-given duty) to impose that Absolute Truth on others. One thing I learned from my time in Amsterdam is the Dutch view of America and Americans. The Netherlands has always seen itself (and postured as, whether it was true or not) a bastion of liberal thought and tolerance. That was true back during the Protestant reformation as well. The result was that a great number of Protestants who had been kicked out of their own countries for trying to impose their idea of Absolute Truth on their neighbors found their way to Holland. After a very short while, their insistence that all of their neighbors live the way *they* wanted them to live, in accordance with *their* idea of Absolute Truth became too much even for the liberal Dutch. So the Dutch suggested that they go forth and multiply in the New World. Thus (in a surprisingly common Dutch point of view) America was populated by people who had been kicked out of pretty much every country in Europe for being uptight and wanting to impose that uptightness on everyone around them. IMO, not much has changed in the centuries since. --- In [email protected], "markmeredith2002" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "markmeredith2002" > > <markmeredith@> wrote: > > <snip> > > > I think everyone here has misread Harris's viewpoints, > > > which might be expected from this type of group. > > > > > Harris does not deny the existence of unbounded eternal > > > divinity or anything else in that realm, he just says > > > you can say with certainty that it exists, or say it is > > > "Truth" that it exists. > > > > I think you meant "cannot say with certainty," right? > > Yeah, sorry. > > > > Harris properly points out the dangers of believing in > > > these sort of absolute unprovable Truths without realizing > > > that they're actually just your own belief systems that > > > you own for whatever reasons, good or bad, but he's not > > > denying anyone the right to hold their belief system - > > > whereas religionists have a tendency to want to deny any > > > other belief system which does not conform to their Truth. > > > > The problem is that you get into an infinite > > regress here. Harris *is* denying religionists > > the right to believe that their beliefs are > > absolute Truth. That is the *foundation* of > > their belief systems. > > > > Sullivan, as far as I can see, is not trying to > > convince Harris that Christianity is Absolute Truth; > > he's trying to show Harris that Harris's reasons > > for asserting that Christianity *cannot* be > > Absolute Truth are not well grounded. > > > > As I said to Barry, the argument isn't symmetrical > > in this regard. > > OK, I see your argument, which only makes me support Harris's concern > about religion more. The typical reasoning of a religionist is that > they must not only be allowed to believe and practice their beliefs > but believe and practice their beliefs as Absolute Truth. That > tendency is what causes trouble. If your belief is Absolute Truth > then anything that disagrees with it is absolute falsehood, sin, the > Devil, and so forth, which justifies lots of strife. > > I watch the documentary Jesus Camp last night, about summer camps > training kids to be good spiritual and political evangelicals. The > adults kept talking about being under fire and persecuted in the US > and the need to change the country to end this. I hear this alot from > evangelicals, that they feel persecuted in this country. I not only > don't see any persecution of them at all, I see them having undue > influence in all branches of gov't. What you realize as you watch > this film is that they feel persecuted because they can't force all > their beliefs into the public schools and laws of the land and make > everyone be good evangelicals. This is what happens when your beliefs > become Truths. > > Anyway Judy as you consider your response please be considerate of > these good Christian Truths that are dear to me: > > "Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not > a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in > silence." [1 Timothy 2:11-15] > > "Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted > unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as > also saith the law. And if they will learn anything, let them ask > their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the > church." [1 Corinthians14:34-36] >
