--Your question..."what's the future" Stop being a Neo-Advaitin nit-picker. The answer to this question can be found in various philosophical texts widely available, some written by physicists. But why not stop there? What is "existence"???
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mathatbrahman" > <mathatbrahman@> wrote: > > > > --Thanks (not you...) but a number of Neo-Advaitins claim to have > a > > lock on how E'd people should act; for example, one says "they" > > dont/can't predict the future. If that were true, they would have > to > > quit their jobs if reliance on predicting the future were > paramount: > > say...being a stock broker. > > > > - In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "qntmpkt" <qntmpkt@> wrote: > > > > > > > > ---"only an ego would have a need for a hierarchy" ...not > > exactly > > > > true; since E'd people sometimes work like everybody else, > some > > of > > > > those jobs require attention to hierarchy. Say one is a > chicken- > > > > sexer before E, and afterwards too (since being Self-Realized > > > doesn't > > > > automatically demand that one quit a job). The job of chicken > > > sexing > > > > (determining the sex of chicks), is a hierarchal matter, > > requiring a > > > > highly skilled expertise in the field. This is not born > > of "ego". > > > > It's just a skill, and hierarchies are part of skills. > > > > > > > I wasn't using the association with ego in a negative way, only > to > > say > > > that hierarchies are relative. When *would* bieng Self realized > > demand > > > that one wuit a job? I haven't heard of that before... > > > > > > What's "the future"? >
