From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard J. Williams Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 11:03 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: we have responded 2 much lets just not respond to Vaj.Ignore all is missives
> > Except for Vaj calling the Maharishi a "perv". Silence > > usually indicates agreement. What's up with that? > > TurquoiseB wrote: > Silence can also indicate boredom with a > topic that has meaning only to those who > are attached to it, one way or another. > So, you agree with Vaj, that the Maharishi is a perv. You worked for Mahesh for what, fourteen years or so. Why all the silence? Why didn't you warn us and what happened to all the money? Maybe we should define "perv." By all accounts, he had normal heterosexual desires, and behaved accordingly. He liked his women young, as young as 19. Does that make him a perv? Probably not. No one thought 60-something Holling Vincour on "Northern Exposure" was a perv because his girlfriend Shelly was only 19. The only problem I have with the thing is that his private and public personae were out of sync, but hey, I'm guilty of hypocrisy, so who am I to judge?
