--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" > <willytex@> wrote: > > > > off_world_beings wrote: > > > And then Bush and cronies, and MDIXON, and R.Williams, go to war > > > illegally against this resolution and the UN, and get the US into a > > > quagmire, just as many of us predicted would happen, and murder 3- > > > 600,000 innocent people in the process, and cause a middle-east > melt- > > > down. > > > > > Eighty-one Dems voted to use force to unseat Saddam > > No, they didn't. Here's what they voted: > > "The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of > the United States as he determines to be necessary and > appropriate in order to (1) defend the national security > of the United States against the continuing threat posed > by Iraq; and (2) enforce all relevant United Nations > Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq."
So, how long do you suppose that Iraq will continue to be a security threat.... That means that they will have to keep some 'eyes' and 'ears' on the ground there, no matter how long they say they are going to stay. And also, with Iran, coming in to fill the vacumn, then that's another reason, to at least, be on the border- since they seem to be our sworn enemy now; The real deal is, though, there is almost complete chaos there now, and it only seems to be getting worse and speading; So, no one really knows how to get us out of this mess. And Iran is supporting a sort of low level chaos, in both Iraq, and Lebanon; and Israel is really getting scared... So, what's a Bush supposed to do- The axis of evil: Rumsfeld, Cheney & Bush, has been broken to some extent: But as long as Cheney is still there, not much is going to change. He's in with the Saudi's, and just last week, he was saying, we've made huge progress in Iraq. So,...it's like the blind leading the blind. >
