off_world_beings wrote: > R.J. Williams and MDIXON think that all the terrorists will > hang out in nice neat camps for them to use their MOAB's on. > Where else would they hang out? In a cave in the Himalayas? The term al Qaeda means 'camp', but if it takes a village I would presume that it would be nice and neat to capture the entire village in one fell swoop - hopefully the terrorists would all lay down their arms and surrender to face prosecution. I'd like to see those who harbor the terrorists to go to jail too. From what I've read, the terrorists who are doing all the Hindu killing in Kashmere live in villages and camps; so do the Tigers of Tamil Elam, who kill the Buddhists in Sri Lanka. It's a fact that many Taliban terrorists like to live in villages in Pakistan. I'd say that the vast majority of terrorists live in cities, in which case the authorites will probably have to go house-to-house to route them out. Spotting a terrorist runing out in the wilderness is probably pretty rare in a densely populated areas. But I've seen several trying to cross the Rio Grand down around Kingsville and I've reported them to the Border Patrol.
> It is the same naive and childish thinking that got you into > your mess in the first place. > You must be thinking of Bill Clinton - he bombed one "camp", killing a camel and destroyed a soap factory. He had Osama in his sights but failed to pull the trigger. He didn't do enough to stop the 9-11 attackers, he failed us, he let us down, big time. Thanks to him and the Dems our Army now can't even win a war on two fronts. The mess started back when the Dems got us into South and North Korea, then into Vietnam and Kosovo. Have the Dems ever won a war? Financial Times: President Bill Clinton believed Iraq might have provided chemical weapons to Sudan in the late 1990s under a co-operative arrangement between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda, the investigation into the September 11 attacks revealed yesterday. Mr Clinton ordered an air strike in August 1998 against the al-Shifa chemical plant in Sudan after officials in the office of Richard Clarke, then White House director of counter-terrorism, concluded that Osama bin Laden, the al-Qaeda leader, had access to deadly VX nerve gas allegedly being produced at the plant. Mr Clarke later said traces of a precursor chemical for VX detected near the plant were "the exact formula used by Iraq" and speculated that Iraq was helping al-Qaeda acquire such weapons. Read the full article: 'US feared Sudan-al-Qaeda terror link' By Edward Alden and Alex Barke Financial Times, Fri, Jul 23, 2004 http://news.ft.com/home/us/ > ie.Middle East Meltdown. > Iraq, in my opinion, is a bright spot in the Middle East, compared to Gaza, Syria, Saudi Arabbia, Iran, or Pakistan. I'd rather live in a free democratic Iraq than in a country ruled by a dictator or a cadre of radical Islamists under Sharia law. > They also think that my estimate of 500,000 new anti-US fanatics > CREATED because of the Iraq war (also as alluded to by US > intelligence agancies) is too high. > No, I was surprised at how low - that means we must have killed over half of the terrorists by now - good shot. Now we'll have to pick the rest off one-by-one wherever they live and breed. The population of North Korea is 23 million. > I predict that a credible government agency will announce AT > LEAST this figure as the new threat created by Bush's (and all > those who supported him) ignorant actions, and that this > asessement will come within the next 3 months. > > When it does, MDIXON and WillyTex will remember my name as it > burns painfully into their brains. > There's no "WillyTex", but if I do think of you, it would be as some off world being, who must be on another planet. May I remind you that we are on planet earth. Apparently you agree that the U.S. is in a war.
