--- In [email protected], off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > > > wrote: > > <snip> > > > > Nevertheless, supernovae are not seen from earth > > > > to flare up and die out in a matter of seconds. > > > > > > > You could be right, based on the recorded evidence, but I don't > > > think that rules out the probability that this could have been an > > > actual astronomical event witnessed from earth, yet not recorded > > > before? Possibly as some have suggested, something that looked > like > > > a super nova, but wasn't. Who knows? I just figure the odds are > in > > > the favor, given the vast size of the observable Universe, of a > > > newly discovered, or unrecorded event, not yet incorporated into > > our > > > current body of knowledge regarding observable astronomical > > > phenomenon. (whew- that's a mouthful). > > > > I said earlier that it could have been some even > > more exotic event. But it couldn't have been a > > supernova.>> > > She stated, in the same emphatic fashion that some used to say that > the Earth cannot revolve around the Sun.
Actually I stated it in the same emphatic fashion that some use to say the earth is not the center of the universe.
