--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "peterklutz" <peterklutz@> > wrote: > <snip> > > Actually, it just might be quite entertaining to see the guy talk > > himself out of that corner :-) > > I imagine there are various word games he can > play, but they'll look awfully cute beside his > accusations that *Lawson* was playing word games. >
I try NOT to play word games because, given my ADHD, I'm so darned lousy at it. I can, with luck, catch others' word games, but keeping track of my own inconsistencies and not mess up on a regular basis? Not a chance. > > More important, however, is the fact that being and acting in > > the capacity of journalist, Andrew Skolnick is de facto bound > > by a set of minimum ethical requirements it is not in his > > interest that people think he has violated. > > If the trial record containing the incriminating > language can be tightly documented, perhaps it > and his relevant posts could be reproduced-- > without comment--on various journalism forums. > > I wonder if the National Association of Science > Writers has an appropriate public forum... > > Oh, bother. It's not worth it. As far as I know, as long as he's not posting about TM or New Age related stuff (or teaching journalism in China), he's a perfectly fine journalist. > > http://www.asne.org/index.cfm?id=387 > > http://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp > > > > I suppose the guy also can be sued :-) > > >
