--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > > > > On Feb 26, 2007, at 7:08 PM, peterklutz wrote: > > <snip> > > > > This is: "What is your Freemasonic lodge's version of Gnosis?" > > > > > > > > It's a simple question. > > > > > > > > Why can't you just answer it? :-) > > > > > > In the experience emblematic of light, as the sun rising in > > > the east. Universal Light. > > > > Translation: Vaj doesn't have a clue. > > Remembering my "gang of ducks" analogy this morning, > doesn't it give you pause sometimes how the desire > to "pile on" and beat up someone they don't like is > more powerful in some of the quackers here than the > desire to disassociate themselves from someone that > even *they* know is crazy?
Apparently the inference Barry wishes to be drawn from his rant is that if one holds a particular opinion, and then discovers that a person with whom one wouldn't choose to associate onself turns out to have the same opinion, one should immediately resolve *never to express* that opinion lest somebody like Barry attempt to put forward a "guilt by association" charge against one. Sure, Barry, that makes a lot of sense. I hereby withdraw every opinion I've ever expressed that happened to be in tune with one of yours. I will never again say anything against George Bush or the Iraq war, for example. <belly laugh>
