--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@>
> > wrote:
> <snip>
> > > They may have an idea of where some of the money is
> > > going, in other words, but they aren't just handing
> > > it over directly to these groups with ties to al Qaeda.
> > >
> > > Minor nuance...
> > >
> > I was watching the same show, and you are right, the ties to pro-
Al-
> > Qaeda groups was posed as a question or a possibility by KO.
>
> Did you see his "special comment" demolishing--
> heck, *disintegrating*--Rice for her unbelievably
> inane remark about World War II? A tour de force,
> if not about the most significant topic in the world...
>
It was good- My desire is now for Congress to act on the mandate to
which they were elected last November. I sense a dark cynicism in
many of them, wanting things in Iraq to get worse, in order to
ensure a Democrat for prez in 2008. That is a cowardly and immoral
stance. I would rather see them propose legislation to cut off
funding for the war, placed in the current budget. That would
demonstrate courage, and reveal the argument that "this would not
support the troops" for the toothless drivel that it is.
