--- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> On Mar 3, 2007, at 3:26 PM, authfriend wrote:
> 
> > Beymer was extraordinary in "Twin Peaks."  Hard to
> > believe after his pathetically callow performance
> > in "West Side Story."
> 
> Well, he was a couple of decades older in TP.

True, but it was hard to believe it was the same
person.

> And also, he couldn't 
> sing, so it's really not clear why they picked him for
> WSS in the first place.

It was all going to be dubbed anyway (except for Rita
Moreno), so they must not have thought that mattered.
The big problem, I thought, was that he didn't have
the tough-guy chops.  He could do dewy-eyed lover OK.

> >>>  In any case, when a TMer does
> >>> something neat, I'm pleased, but an artist just being
> >>> a TMer isn't enough to *make* something neat, as far
> >>> as I'm concerned.  I mean, "Bridges of Madison
> >>> County"??
> >>
> >> The movie, even with a great cast, wasn't great, and
> >> the book was truly awful, writing-wise.  But for some
> >> reason I loved the book.
> >
> > Never read the book...  I really loathed the movie.
> > Somehow it managed to expose Meryl Streep's artifice.
> > I've never enjoyed a performance of hers since.
> > Eastwood was OK but seemed out of his depth.  I don't
> > think romantic is his thing; he's too edgy.
> 
> I really didn't think either one of them seemed right 
> for the roles, 

Yup, bad casting.

> and the movie seemed flat to me.

That's what I meant about lack of continuity, I think.
There was no "arc," no build, just a series of scenes
one after the other with not much carryover between
them emotionally.



> 
> > And his direction just had no continuity, or maybe
> > it was terrible editing, but the director should
> > have control over the editing.
> >
>


Reply via email to