--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "peterklutz" <peterklutz@> wrote: > > > > Reading this post by Michael Dean Goodman: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/131314 > > > > ... it seems the assumed starting point is always mind's > > "thinking" level. > > > > Given the inward direction of TM-practice it would seem that > > clinging to an over-intellectual schematic approach might > > become a problem as thoughts becomes feelings, feelings > > settles down into sense of my-ness, then am-ness, and is-ness. > > > > What detailed commentaries has Maharishi offered on the process > > below the "thinking" level of the mind. > > > > Vaj, TB and Paul Mason need not respond. > > Thanks for "exempting" me, Peter, but I want to > respond to your question anyway. I have no earthly > idea what Maharishi might have said about these > things, and I don't care. For some of us, meditation > is something we do because it enables us to stop > thinking and just sit quietly in samadhi.
Kill dat Buddha, dude. Others > seem to use it as something to think even more about. > Different strokes for different folks, I guess. >
