--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "peterklutz" <peterklutz@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> > <snip> 
> > > > Actually, I merely mentioned the THINGS TMers BELIEVE
> > > > thread on the other forums, and posted a few repre-
> > > > sentative quotes of what long-term TM practitioners
> > > > such as yourself believe, *in your own words*. They
> > > > asked to be copied on future issues.
> > > > 
> > > > None of *my* words will appear in these threads, except
> > > > to note context or who or what is being talked about.
> > > > If anyone comes to any conclusions about TM and its 
> > > > benefits or lack of benefits for long-term practitioners,
> > > > it'll be because of what the long-term TMers themselves
> > > > have to say.
> > >
> > > So that's why FFL is so popular, people like you go
> > > about advertising the 24/7/365 Party here!
> > 
> > Remember a few days back I pointed out that
> > Barry's been trying one trick after another--
> > even though none of them have ever worked--to
> > intimidate his critics into shutting up?  The
> > last one was putting them on a list of 
> > "representative TM practitioners" for the
> > purported benefit of "lurkers."
> > 
> > Then I asked what the next one would be; I knew
> > it wouldn't be long in coming once that one
> > had flopped.  Anyway, this is it.
> 
> On the contrary. PLEASE keep posting here -- as
> often as you like, as agressively as you like, 
> and as nastily as you like. Say anything negative
> that you want about any of the TM critics here or
> about me in particular. Go to town.
> 
> Most of them will be ignored -- by me and by others
> here -- and some of the rest will end up in the 
> THINGS TMers BELIEVE thread, and thus you will fin-
> ally have your chance to be the representative of
> TM and its benefits that you've always longed to be.
> People all over the world will look to your words,
> and Jim's, and those of several others here, and
> they will judge TM based solely *on your own words*.
> 
> I just can't imagine a more karmically fair situation,
> can you? I'm not going to make ANY comments on the
> quotes, other than to gather them together and make
> them available. The words shall stand on their own,
> and you guys really DO believe these things, don't
> you? I don't see what you're griping about.
>

For a guy that says he is not going to do anything else than quote
others, you own aural environmental impact is quite staggering.

And do feel free to turn of your mike and webcam. 

Moving images of frothing old men with their hair on end manically
hacking away on a keyboard with scary organ music in the background
may scare youngsters.

Reply via email to