--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "peterklutz" <peterklutz@> wrote: > > > > > > > > TB. No sane person spends time compiling things like this. > > > > It's beyond right or wrong - it's pathological. > > > > > > > > Get a life. Now. > > > > > > It would be good to snip most of what you're quoting to > > > save bandwidth. > > > > It would have been better never to have felt the need > > to say most of this stuff in the first place. > > And even better not to feel the need to repeat it over > and over again. How many newsgroups and forums have > you posted your stuff to, Unc?
Only seven. So far. Here, four large Unix listservs, and two Google (Usenet) groups. Oh, and today I provided links to the FFL versions on TM-Free, so that their readers can read for themselves the ways in which strong, long-term TMers react to those who speak critically of TM, the TM organization, and Maharishi. That's the point, y'know. If these repre- sentative TMers had contented themselves with responding only to the *ideas* that these TM critics proposed, without trying to systematically demonize them, there would have been nothing for me to collect up and publish. But that's not the case, is it? The first two issues of THINGS TMers BELIEVE catalog some of the ways that strong TMers react to ideas that run counter to their own over a period of no more than NINE DAYS. Just imagine the things I'll be able to collect and publish as this series goes on...
