--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > You know, Judy, if you're so upset about seeing your own words > > > > supposedly out of context (I believe you said that a while back) > > > > just go through what Barry posts and give the context. > > > > Considering the amount you usually post by your own admission, > > > > I would think that would not be much of a problem. > > > > > > Except, Brry hsan't told us where he is repeating the words. And > > > googling a phrase, doesn't always reveal all instances of that > > > phrase on the internet, because not all forums > > > are archived in google, I've noticed. > > > > They can use the Yahoo Groups search feature on > > the FFL page and find out whose post it was. And > > they'll also get the context. > > > > (Note that Sal is using Barry's trick of pretending > > any TMer who comes up with a criticism is "upset.") > > And note that the person who has now made at least > a dozen posts complaining about the lack of context > -- to at least two different Internet forums -- > is now claiming that she "isn't upset."
That's right, Barry. I'm making a point about your execrable behavior. > And on the 3rd forum she posted to in the last few > days, trying to do damage control surrounding THINGS > TMers BELIEVE, the thing she "wasn't upset" about > there was a comment from me correcting a typo in > which I mentioned that someone we knew in common who > had met her had described her as looking...uh...old. Ditto: making a point about your execrable behavior, in this case your gross dishonesty. We don't know anybody in common, and as I said, nobody with normal eyesight would say I looked any older than my actual age. You made that tale up out of whole cloth. > Judy...this is another one of those things that you'd > rather prefer to believe is a lie or a trick on my > part, but it's another of those things that is not. > The person in question *did* say that. There isn't any such person, Barry. You made it up. Duh. You *are* > old...what's your problem with *looking* old? (For those who haven't seen his post on alt.m.t, Barry claimed this fictional person said I looked 300 years old.) I'm 65, and I have no problem whatsoever looking my age (or being 65, for that matter). > But think of it this way...now you have one more thing > to be "not upset" about, don't you? :-) You know, Barry, one of these days *you're* going to be 65 (God willing). You aren't as old as I am, but you're getting there. If you can't bring yourself to welcome it, for your own peace of mind you at least need to *resign* yourself to it.
