--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine > > <salsunshine@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > You know, Judy, if you're so upset about seeing your own > > words > > > > > > supposedly out of context (I believe you said that a while > > back) > > > > > > just go through what Barry posts and give the context. > > > > > > Considering the amount you usually post by your own > > admission, > > > > > > I would think that would not be much of a problem. > > > > > > > > > > Except, Brry hsan't told us where he is repeating the words. > > And > > > > > googling a phrase, doesn't always reveal all instances of that > > > > > phrase on the internet, because not all forums > > > > > are archived in google, I've noticed. > > > > > > > > They can use the Yahoo Groups search feature on > > > > the FFL page and find out whose post it was. And > > > > they'll also get the context. > > > > > > > > (Note that Sal is using Barry's trick of pretending > > > > any TMer who comes up with a criticism is "upset.") > > > > > > And note that the person who has now made at least > > > a dozen posts complaining about the lack of context > > > -- to at least two different Internet forums -- > > > is now claiming that she "isn't upset." > > > > That's right, Barry. I'm making a point about > > your execrable behavior. > > Which you're not the least "upset" about, eh? :-)
Nope. The more opportunities you provide to call attention to your lack of credibility, the better. <snip> > > There isn't any such person, Barry. You made > > it up. > > Think about it. I'm sure it'll come to you. :-) Barry, it's not working.
