--- In [email protected], "Mr. Magoo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "Mr. Magoo" <wgm4u@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In the intro to Love and God, p. 11, with reference to Guru Dev,
> > > > Maharishi says "We only pray Him to keep on guiding us," implying 
> > > > that he considers Guru Dev to still be playing a active role from 
> > > > wherever he is.
> > > 
> > > MMY says, "We only pray...", he doesn't say he IS!! MMY may or may 
> > > not know, or it may be presumptous for him to say. Whether Swami
> > > Brahmananda took on a 'Bodhisattva' role in the governence of the
> > > Universe is speculative at best and CLEARLY has nothing to do with
> > > 'awareness' spoken of in the puja!
> > 
> > Have you ever heard Maharishi admit to the possibility
> > of someone who is enlightened dying and taking on a 
> > 'Bodhisattva' role? I sure haven't. I remember one long
> > lecture in which he went on and on and on saying that
> > the *only* possibility for what happens to an enlight-
> > ened being when they die is that "the drop returns to 
> > the ocean," and he said definitely in that talk (in 
> > response to several direct questions) that there was 
> > *no* possibility of an enlightened being ever incarnating 
> > again in any form -- human or subtle.
> > 
> > Now I don't personally believe this, but that's what the
> > man said. But then he has waffled on many subjects before,
> > so it's possible that he later recanted and allowed for
> > there being more possibilities than the one he was adamant
> > about in that talk. Has anyone here ever heard Maharishi 
> > speak of anything other than "the drop returns to the 
> > ocean" model?
> > 
> > I'm mentioning it because if no one has, then Jim's claim
> > to have "met" Guru Dev would seem to imply that Maharishi
> > was...uh...wrong.
> > 
> > Either that or it's possible that Jim was...uh...wrong,
> > and what he "met" was the aftereffects of one of his
> > burger and margarita feasts. :-)
> 
> In the broader context, I think a Master can reconstitute 
> his form at any time, the essence (consciousness) is the 
> same. Even Christ appeared to his disciples after the 
> Resurrection. Form is not soul!

I don't disagree with you in the least. What I was
asking is whether anyone here has ever heard *Maharishi*
say this, or anything like it. I ask because I and others
here (if I remember correctly) have heard him say the
exact opposite.




Reply via email to