--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > Do *you* believe that Jim has "met" Guru Dev, > > > and that he is correct in his assessment of > > > himself as being Self Realized? > > > > I haven't the foggiest. > > Me, either. However, I'm willing to say that > the answer to both questions seems *likely* > to be "No," given his inability here in the > past to discern overwhelming emotion from > spiritual experience.
ROTFL!!! Jim shouldn't trust his experience, he should trust what *you say* about his experience. > Are *you* willing to say whether either seems > likely to you? "Haven't the foggiest" means I don't lean either way; I genuinely have no idea. Whether either is "true" neither concerns nor even interests me. I don't even know what "true" might mean in this context. > Thought not. You were pretty outspoken about > what you thought about Rory, but then Rory > wasn't one of your "pile on partners," was he. :-) Hmm, I don't think I ever said anything, let alone outspokenly, about what I thought of Rory's state of consciousness. You're apparently hallucinating again. As with Jim, I really have no idea and don't care. > > > > Now watch the waffling begin. :-) > > And watch it continue. :-)
