> In a message dated 3/11/2007 11:53:58 P.M. Eastern
> Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
>  
>  
>  
> Peter, answer some points for a change instead of
> barging in like 
> some  fundamentalist in denial.

What specific points would you like me to answer? You
don't make an argument against anything I said. You
draw a parallel between something SSRS is doing and
what MMY is doing, see them as the same thing, and
then infer that the same criticism I have towards MMY
can be applied towards SSRS. You must think I'm a SSRS
fundie or something. I'm not. But I have noticed that
SSRS is much more rational than MMY. This is neither
good nor bad, just a difference between the two. Most
likely the university that SSRS is talking about will
actually get built because the discussion will be
grounded in the waking state realities of creating
such a project. If SSRS wants to build a university, I
believe that his actual agenda is to build a
university. Not so with MMY. Through personal
experience and the personal experience of many others
it seems that MMY is rarely doing what he appears to
be doing. On the surface MMY wants to build a
university. From a waking state rational perspective
this is insane. Why? Well, there already is MUM. Why
not sink capital into that university? Why build a
university in the middle of nowhere? Why would more
students come to such a school? This university will
never occur and I truly believe it is not MMY's intent
for it to occur. Also, what do you mean by a
fundamentalist in denial? Denial of what? A
fundamentalist of what or whom? Also, why not post
using your name? 


> 
> ""The Sri Sri Ravi Shankar Vidya Mandir Trust  and
> the Government of 
> Orissa signed a Memorandum of Understanding on 
> December 18, 2006 to 
> establish a full-fledged multidisciplinary
> university  near the state 
> capital, Bhubaneswar within two or three years. The
> goal of  the 
> university would be to provide holistic education
> that is firmly  
> embedded in Indian culture and ethos to the global
> leaders of  
> tomorrow. Admission into the university will be
> based on merit alone,  
> which will be assessed based on an entrance
> examination. Admission  
> into the proposed varsity will be open to Indian as
> well as foreign  
> nationals. It will be designed to cater to the needs
> of 1,500 faculty  
> members, an equal number of non-academic staff
> members, and 15,000  
> students. The proposed university will impart
> postgraduate education  
> in various disciplines to approximately 15,000
> Indian and foreign  
> students. These disciplines will include both
> traditional Indian as  
> well as modern fields of  study.""-
> wikipedia.org/wikipedia.wikipedia.org/<Wwi
> 
> And  so Peter Sutphen is saying that :
> 
> ""anyone who seriously believes that  such a project
> by Sri Sri Ravi 
> Shankar is possible has spent way too many  years
> drinking the 
> koolaid. That being said, if you approach your 
> involvement in this 
> as, on one hand, total absurdity, and on the other 
> hand, as something 
> your mind can do to break all boundaries, then fine.
> It  will be 
> your "controlled folly" to borrow a term from Carlos
> Castenada.  But 
> failure to recognize the absurdity of this and to
> delude yourself  
> into thinking that it will actually occur without
> acknowledging the  
> absurdity of it just makes your mind and intent
> very, very weak. Why  
> let Sri Sri Ravi Shankar enslave you? Does he have
> to hammer nails  
> into your palms to get you to wake-up to your own
> spiritual  intent?""
> 
> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (mailto:[email protected]) 
> ,  Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> >
> > The whole  thing is just absurd and anyone who
> > seriously believes that such a  project is
> possible has
> > spent way too many years drinking the koolaid. 
> That
> > being said, if you approach your involvement in
> this
> > as,  on one hand, total absurdity, and on the
> other
> > hand, as something your  mind can do to break all
> > boundaries, then fine. It will be your 
> "controlled
> > folly" to borrow a term from Carlos Castenada. But
> >  failure to recognize the absurdity of this and to
> > delude yourself into  thinking that it will
> actually
> > occur without acknowledging the  absurdity of it
> just
> > makes your mind and intent very, very weak. Why 
> let
> > MMY enslave you? Does he have to hammer nails into
> > your  palms to get you to wake-up to your own
> spiritual
> > intent?





 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get your own web address.  
Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL

Reply via email to