--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine
<salsunshine@>
> > wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > Judy, what do you think of the idea that Cheney might be
> > > history in a couple of weeks, due to health problems,
supposedly?
> > > Think it's going to happen, and, if so, who do you imagine
will
> > > replace him?
> >
> > I think it would be terrific.
> >
> > I don't think it's likely, but with this bunch, you
> > never know.
>
> It occurs to me that one reason they might actually
> jettison Cheney--sooner rather than later--would be
> to create a distraction from the *other* unfolding
> scandals, in particular the U.S. attorney firings,
> which is currently in the process of going nuclear.
> So far, Cheney doesn't appear to have been involved
> in that one.
>
So far just a bunch of blabbing by the Democrats, as Bush gets
stronger. Just yesterday the Dems decided to remove any
Congressional authorization for Bush to attack Iran. Bush, his
adminstration, and his wars are increasingly unpopular, but he is
getting more powerful, not less.
