--- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > peterklutz wrote: > > The point I made in this thread is that only intellectual > > knowledge is worthless, even counterproductive. That's one > > reason for Maharishi's greatness - he has actually given > > people the experience and tools they need to become > > Enlightened. > > > Maybe so, but surely there's a defintion of what TM is and what a TMer > is - it's just common sense, that you'd define what it is that you're > talking about, so we could agree on some basics. That's my point, but > nobody seems to be able to say what, exactly, a TMer is supposed to > be. And who gets to pronounce who is and who isn't a TMer anyway? >
You have already given a clear definition of what a TMer is. Twice.
