--HA HA!. No. The Hairdresser was walking by MMY's room. The door to MMY's room was ajar, allowing the hairdresser to witness the going's on in the room: namely, MMY and a female were having sex. The Hairdresser and I both worked at SIMS in L.A. and he told me the above in 1973; but I can't recall exactly when the supposed event occurred.(just sometime before). Therefore, your objection that the incident was bogus because MMY couldn't have been in 3 places at once, doesn't hold water. If the Popes can be in two places at once: Avignon and Rome, then the Mahareeshee can be in three places at once. What I'm wondering about is why, in view of a growing mountain of circumstantial evidence, one would turn a blind eye to the "truth", unless it's "truthiness" you're after (what you want to be true). The real question is, what is the implication of all of this, given such incidents are true? Does it suggest anything, other than a healthy libido? Personally, I believe so, since MMY led people to believe he was celibate. That's like a Scooter Libby lie.
- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > MMY's hairdresser told me (1973) that he accidently > > > > walked by MMY's open door at a course in India; and > > > > he was in a sexual embrace with a female. > > > > > sparig wrote: > > > And what kind of door was it in a place where you > > > could glance through it? I thought the huts in > > > Rishikesh were kinda semi-underground? > > > > > And how could MMY have been in India in 1973 at the > > same time that he was at La Antilla, Spain TTC? This > > guy gets more amazing every hour - invisible sex acts > > for decades, remote appearing acts, amazing sexual > > energy at 3:00 AM in the morning AND a hairdresser! > > > Rick Archer wrote: > > He didn't say the incident happened in 1973. He said > > the hairdresser told him this in 1973. > > > What was the hairdresser doing in a sexual embrace with a female in > front of an MMY's open door in India? >
