> But again, someone would > have to spend a lot of > time monitoring and counting posts
Rick, we already have subscribers who would love to do some of the monitoring. No one needs to count all of the posts by all of the posters daily, but if an AMTer goes over the daily limit, someone will be eager to report it. We could probably get a 900 number and charge them 25 dollars to make a report and still they'd call. :) --- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of lurkernomore20002000 > Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 10:25 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Sorry Rick but maybe I > had something to do with > FFL going pearshaped > > > > Vaj: > I second that, moderating is needed by someone > otherwise this list is > down > > the tubes. > > > >Rick: > How would you suggest it be moderated? If someone > volunteered to do > it, what > > criteria would they follow? How would they be > objective? > > I would say, limit posts by any one person to no > more than 12 per > day. That would require people to post more > selectively. > > I think that's a good one. It would keep people like > spraig from firing off > dozens of "me too" posts. But again, someone would > have to spend a lot of > time monitoring and counting posts. Yahoo isn't so > sophisticated a system > that you can cut off someone's posting rights after > a specified quota has > been reached. > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
