From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of peterklutz Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 9:13 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A Fairfield Life suggestion from a friend
Apparently the basic problem is not quantity but lack of quality. So, aside limiting Vaj's barrage of closet-illuminati propaganda snipets to 3 or 5 a day, how about introducting an upper limit on the number of words a reply may contain (perhaps not for original postings), including what is quoted? It only takes one click to delete a 1,000 line post, but it takes 1,000 clicks to delete 1,000 one-line posts, unless you delete them as a block, which I often do (I'm talking about email, since that's how I read FFL. Over-posters must be a greater annoyance to those who read FFL in their browser. Especially if you like to read by scrolling from one post to the next.)
