In this new regime, if someone has unsubscribed from the group, are personal attacks on them permitted because they're no longer around to read and respond to them?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > LOL, I guess he never realized that people were simply being > *realistic*. > > Probably best he left if he felt so defensive he could not get that. > > > On Mar 19, 2007, at 8:29 AM, authfriend wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub" <llundrub@> wrote: > >> > >> How did that happen. > > > > I found this in my inbox this morning from Lawson: > > > > > > Hey Judy, > > > > Yeah, I felt kinda singled out about the number-of-postings issue. I > > sent a "fairwell, it's been fun" message, and then quit the group > > before my message percolated through the Yahoo mail system (Yahoo > > group messages sent via the online interface apparently send emails > > to the Yahoo group server) so it was rejected because I was not a > > member of FFL and couldn't post messages. > > > > I think everyone on the "anti" side is rather distressed right now, > > due to the increased publicity on TM, and the ongoing Invicible > > America project, not to mention that pundits are finally arriving. > > Aside from MMY allegedly not keeping his dick in his dhoti, they have > > little to bash the TMO about these days, so they take it out on TM > > supporters that dare show their faces. > > > > Ah well, even so, Paul Mason found FFL too pro-TM so he high- tailed > > it back to the TMFree blog, so I guess one man's excessively- biased- > > in-one-direction forum can be perceived as excessively biased in the > > other, depending where you fall on the scale of bias. > > > > Enjoy FFL and whatnot. Say hi and bye to everyone and explain what > > happened. I didn't leave without warning. You can even post this > > message to the group if you like. > > > > Later, > > > > Lawson >
