--- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of TurquoiseB > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 9:58 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [FairfieldLife] 4 Post Notice (was Re: ++Attack++) > > Bottom line is that if the limit is set at a fixed > five posts per day, EVERYONE will have to stop and > *think* before they press Send. They'll have to say > to themselves, "Self, do I *really* want to waste > one of my five posts a day on this crap?" If one > allows all sorts of "exceptions" to the rule, the > answer they come up with is all too often going to > be, "Why YES, I *do* want to make this petty post, > because it doesn't "count" against my limit." If > the policy allows NO exceptions, the answer is > more likely to be, "NO, I don't want to waste one > of my five posts on this issue. I will save my > energies (and my posts) for something more > substantive." And isn't that exactly what the > new policy is supposed to be all about? > > Good points. Let's compromise and say that today only, a few clarification > posts will not be counted against one's total, but after today, they will.
How about posts simply reporting an attack, do they count? You or gullible fool--can't remember which--earlier said they wouldn't be.
