--- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rick Archer wrote: > > I think at this point blatant offensive personal attacks > > would warrant moderation. > > > Mr. Archer - This was a blatant and unwarranted personal attack on me by Mr. Stanley. My > name is not "willytex" - I already told him that. My name is Richard J. Williams. > > What kind of moderator is it that sets up rules to prevent personal attacks and then turns > around and attacks the person who is notifying him of a personal attack? > > My post entitled ++Attack++ was not "incoherent gibberish". > > This is pathetic - a moderator who doesn't even read a message that notifies him of a > personal attack and then has the nerve to denigrate the complainer, > > Mr. Stanley should be unsubscribed to this forum for posting a personal attack - I am > offended. In my opinion, Mr. Stanley owes me an apology and you, Sir, owe me an > explanation. Otherwise, I must assume that you and Mr. Stanley are not worthy of further > dialog.
This is rather funny. We somehow finally limit a few fools to 5 posts a day. Then what happens ? This place is swarmed by even greater argumentative fools. Whats wrong with having a 1 post limit pr day ? As I have said before; FFL is and will continue to be a Fools Paradise. (I liked Jims article on his personal journey though. Good timing Jim !)
