--- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Robert Gimbel wrote: > > In order to have cause and effect, there must be the > > dimension of time present. Therefore, these laws do > > apply in the relative world of time and sequence. > > > Can you cite an example of cause and effect which does > not exist in time and space? If so, it would be > transcendental, that is, beyond space and time. That > would be termed Brahman, which is not an object of > knowledge. Brahman is a metaphysical or philosophical > concept. >
This is really weird. There's something in Richard's text that often makes this fella feel good. Perhaps it's the rhythm... hmmm... :D For some reason it seems to activate the visual cortex... diirghatamaa maamateyo jujurvaan dashame yuge | apaam arthaM yatiinaam brahmaa bhavati saarathiH!
