curtisdeltablues wrote: > > Your ad hominem attacks only reveal your own inability to deal > > with the content of what I post in a rational, polite manor. > > jim_flanegin wrote: > Color me crazy but I am leery of those who having been slavish > proponents of one way of life are now hugely critical of it. > Well, Jim, it does make one wonder what's up with them. If they lied for all those years, promising enlightenment in 5-7 years, why would anyone believe a thing they have to say now?
There's this one guy on a.m.t that claimed to have TMO status and asserted that he had taught TM to over 5,000 people up in Utah. Then he joined the newsgroup and tried to pick a fight with Judy, trashing the TMO and Marshy to no end, for years. It would seem that these kinds of back-sliders would at least offer a public apology and refund the money to all those poor students that they lied to for all those years. But have you seen any indication that the two Barry's, Rick, or anyone else are considering giving a refund on a broken promise? I haven't - maybe I missed it. I mean, if these kinds of people believe in karma, they are surely going to hell for a long time for supporting and diseminating a dangerous cult and taking money from the poor. Apparently, the two Barry's and Rick actually worked for the TMO, and now you're saying that Curtis ran a TM Center? If what they say now is true, then they owe a lot of people an explanation. And why they keep up posting their rants here now is even more of a mystery. You'd think they would move on and like, get a life, instead of wasting time here bashing you and Judy. Go figure. > Hi, I have no idea what an ad hominem attack is- sounds like > some kind of early human warfare, as in the ad hominems are > at it again!... in any case, I did a google search on your name and > found out you've been slandering the movement for about ten > years now. On the other hand, you were in charge of a TM center > before that, and had a "vedic wedding" for christ's sake! So I don't > know what to attribute that radical inconsistency to, except that it > appears to me you are trying to come to grips with being vedic-lite > or some such. What the hell, why not try something really unusual, > like accepting what you did and who you were, and give Maharishi > and Guru Dev a rest? Its creepy and irresponsible in my view. or > downright ad hominem-enem-enem... >
