;-)

--- curtisdeltablues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> First to Pete:  Thanks man.  You have always been a
> positive vibe in 
> my life.  I miss our lunches at MIU.
> 
> To Main:
> 
> I think you missed my point about my years in TM.  I
> need no 
> absolution and don't even think of it as a poor
> judgement.  I joined 
> TM when I was 16 and was fulltime by 18. How
> fantastic was your 
> judgement at that age?  Of the options I had at the
> time, I could 
> have done much worse.  If I had my druthers I might
> not have stayed 
> in so long, but who can run their life on hindsight?
>  I had a blast 
> and am happy that I put the pedal to the metal and
> gave it my all.
> 
> Changing perspectives as we grow is natural, right?
> Just because I 
> don't hold my mystical experiences in the same value
> weight I once 
> did, doesn't mean I am not glad I had them.  It
> helps me understand a 
> lot of things about history.  I just don't need to
> keep experiencing 
> them.  This is a personal choice. 
> 
> 
> I have nothing to sell. I will always be exressive
> of my perspecive 
> on the world.  I have plenty of people in my life
> who share it, and 
> plenty who do not, just as it should be. 
> 
> No misspent years my friend.  Just another pilgram
> following his 
> heart, just like you. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected],
> "mainstream20016" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Re: Curtis M., 
> >       Yes, Peter, Curtis is wonderful.  He has
> marvelous 
> > talent and charm. His posts on FFL create
> spontaneous 
> > outbursts of laughter. 
> >       On the other hand....   I would appreciate
> him more
> > were I not to get the sense that he traded one
> messianic
> > mission for another in 1989, and since then, and 
> > including today, is recruiting for the new
> mission.
> >       It seems that if one is embarrassed, one 
> > would minimize  attention to one's poor judgement,
> rather 
> > than shout from the rooftop. The gamble Curtis
> takes
> > is that we will absolve him from personal
> responsibility for 
> > his choices, and place all responsibility for his
> misspent 
> > years at the feet of MMY and his movement.  Sorry,
>  I'm not buying.
> > Luv ya, still, Curtis.
> > 
> >      
> >       
> > 
> >    
> > --- In [email protected], Peter
> <drpetersutphen@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey, you guys leave Curtis alone. We hungout
> together
> > > at MIU and he's quite "otay" in my book. If you
> > > personally knew Curtis there's no way in the
> world you
> > > guys would attack him or attempt to demean him.
> He's
> > > one of the good guys. He really is. I could give
> a
> > > rat's ass what the difference is between his
> take on
> > > the TMO/MMY, etc. and what my take is. Who
> cares. I
> > > could care less if he tried to deprogram me as I
> came
> > > out of the dome. What would it matter. We could
> talk
> > > about it over chapatis and tastey dahl, yum!
> > > 
> > > --- curtisdeltablues <curtisdeltablues@>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I will address this to judyjim who seem to
> have
> > > > formed a symbiotic
> > > > entity of malice toward me personally.
> > > > 
> > > > From the ages of 16 through 31 I explored the
> > > > teachings of MMY.  I did
> > > > it with the enthusiasm and commitment that I
> needed
> > > > to experience the
> > > > states of mind his programs bring.  At age 31
> I
> > > > began a process of
> > > > re-evaluating my experiences from outside
> MMY's
> > > > system and found those
> > > > explanations to be more useful to me, and to
> my mind
> > > > more truthful. 
> > > > In other words, I changed my mind due to new
> > > > information and
> > > > perspectives as I grew up.  It was a long
> process
> > > > and came at a cost,
> > > > but it was worth it. As I have said many
> times, I do
> > > > not regret my
> > > > experiences with MMY's teachings.  I gained
> all
> > > > sorts of value from
> > > > those years.  But I also look at the movement
> and
> > > > its leader's
> > > > self-importance as ridiculous and a good
> subject for
> > > > humor. 
> > > > 
> > > > Judyjim have presented a criticism of my total
> > > > commitment and sincere
> > > > efforts when I was a part of organization a
> few
> > > > times here, as if
> > > > following MMY's strictest programs, sidhaland
> and
> > > > MIU was a personal
> > > > failure of mine.  They also point to my
> willingness
> > > > to share my new
> > > > perspective with those who were interested as
> if
> > > > this too reveals a
> > > > defect in my character.
> > > > 
> > > > The attempt to paint my life as "troubled"
> because I
> > > > was sincerely
> > > > focused on MMY's teachings for 15 years, and
> since
> > > > 1989  have
> > > > expressed another point of view on his
> teaching, is
> > > > lame.  Rather then
> > > > discussing ideas, it is the last resort to
> attempt
> > > > to attack the
> > > > person rather than an argument.  It is the
> lowest
> > > > form of discourse.
> > > > It takes neither imagination or intellectual
> > > > insight.  
> > > > 
> > > > To Judy:  You have brought up the idea that
> when I
> > > > fight back when
> > > > personally attacked here, it is a flaw in my
> "nice
> > > > guy image".  This
> > > > is a contrivance of your own invention.  I am
> not a
> > > > nice guy to people
> > > > who attack me. I fight back when I feel it is
> > > > appropriate.  I am nice
> > > > to people who treat me with respect and have
> the
> > > > ability to discuss
> > > > ideas without making it a personal attack.  I
> will
> > > > always point out
> > > > when a person is being rude to me or attacking
> me
> > > > personally. Your
> > > > continued hostility towards me personally
> speaks for
> > > > itself about your
> > > > personal values.  I do not share them.  
> > > > 
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to